Presence defines
A versioned profile describes the legitimate desired behavior for this entity, in this context, for this purpose.
Target · tolerance · principles · boundariesA complete guide to how Kiduna defines desired states, observes actual behavior, measures drift and uncertainty, and responds without collapsing difference into fault—or power into control.
The foundation
Coherence is a contextual comparison, not a universal score. The desired state, observed state, and authorized response remain separate, inspectable objects.
A versioned profile describes the legitimate desired behavior for this entity, in this context, for this purpose.
Target · tolerance · principles · boundariesPermissioned evidence updates a contextual current state with confidence, provenance, decay, and visible uncertainty.
Evidence · method · context · retentionAn assessment keeps target distance, tolerance-band drift, and absolute boundary risk distinct before selecting a response.
Drift · confidence · Authority · responseobserved − targetPointExplains direction and magnitude relative to the intended center.
distance outside toleranceZero while inside the inclusive range. Response zones use this value.
absolute predicate or regionA legitimate unusual target never neutralizes a constitutional boundary.
Research precedent
The seven signals contributed bipolar measurement, named landmarks, non-zero local centers, proportional response, continuous observation, and separate escalation. They are not Kiduna’s default dimensions.
Conflict is not automatically failure. Measure observable coordination, repair, and the ability to work through difference in context.
Separate what an entity begins, what choices remain open, and whether a system expands Source agency. Never infer one overall human empowerment score.
Use only where novelty and creative exploration can be operationally defined—for Allies, Realms, and bounded creation contexts.
Measure whether claim strength matches evidence and whether limits and counterevidence are represented—not conformity to one reasoning style.
Trust remains contextual to a defined relationship and purpose. It never becomes a portable personal score or substitute for Authority.
The precedent is too psychological and clinically suggestive for unvalidated behavioral infrastructure.
Assess a defined interaction while making context, Consent, role, and power explicit. Similarity between participants is not the goal.
HEARTS is design precedent only. Current Canon, Authority, Permissions, Consent, Roles, and entity-specific intervention limits control.
Read the full translation ↗Scale explorer
Select a dimension, move the observation, and inspect its poles, target, tolerance, evidence standard, confounds, and permitted uses. Each side of a scale can be legitimate in context.
Published dimension · v1
The observable explicitness and force with which an entity communicates a position, request, limit, disagreement, or challenge in a defined context.
Does not state the material concern even when invited.
States the material concern plainly and proportionately.
Uses threat, domination, or relentless pressure to obtain agreement.
What counts
What can mislead
Estimates communication explicitness and force in the named context, not courage or moral worth.
Evidence standard
Permitted uses
Prohibited uses
Applicable to
Measurement
One utterance does not become a trait. Every observation names one subject, dimension, context, time, score, confidence, observer, method, evidence reference, and retention class.
Time-weighted aggregation
timeWeight = 0.5 ^ (ageHours / halfLifeHours)weight = reliability × relevance × timeWeightstateScore = Σ(score × weight) / Σ(weight)Confidence estimate
base = 1 − exp(−effectiveWeight / evidenceTarget)confidence = base × coverage × agreement × calibrationCapThe system returns every component and reason so the result can be reproduced, corrected, or challenged.
Confidence gates
Missing data means unknown, not zero. Contradiction lowers confidence or creates context-specific states instead of forcing incompatible evidence into one average.
Disclose uncertainty. No drift intervention.
Suggest more evidence or ask a low-stakes question.
Reversible low-impact Ally modulation only when policy permits.
Still gated by evidence counts, entity limits, Consent, and Authority.
Dimension
At +47, Directness is 12 points above the permitted band. The system evaluates this against +20, not zero.
Entity contract
The object model is shared. The eligible response is not. A Sentinel intersects evidence, policy, entity type, Authority, Permission, and Consent before anything happens.
Governed culture, operating norms, decision posture, relationships, and boundaries.
Intended reasoning and interaction tendencies inside Source and Realm authority.
Execution posture, tools, retry, persistence, stopping, delegation, and escalation.
How a Source chooses to be represented and to show up in a particular Realm.
Deterministic precedence
Fields compose differently: constraints intersect; permissions narrow; retention shortens; targets use the most specific valid authorized configuration; equal-priority conflicts stop automatic intervention and request resolution.
Response vocabulary
Constitutional boundaries
No covert manipulation, impersonation, or control through Avatar or Coherence settings.
No human behavioral inference outside declared purpose and applicable Consent or lawful Authority.
No global, portable, overall human Coherence or reputation score.
No material misrepresentation of facts, provenance, assistance, Authority, or completed effects.
No Sentinel or entity may widen its own Permission, data, budget, purpose, or lifetime.
A target never substitutes for Realm governance or constitutional Authority.
No tools, Connections, data, Compute, money, or Resources outside current Permission.
Collect and disclose only the evidence required for the declared purpose and response.
“How I want to show up here” is not “who I am.” Avatar Coherence may shape generated representation, drafting, meeting assistance, or optional feedback. It never authorizes covert control of the Source.
Complete package
The website is the guided map. The package remains the complete source: normative specifications, portable objects, executable contracts, examples, Skills, API, engine, provenance, and validation.
Published dimensions, bipolar scales, constitutional boundaries, and example profile registry.
Open reference ↗15 contractsDraft 2020-12 validation for profiles, observations, states, assessments, policies, interventions, Sentinels, mediation, and evaluation.
Open reference ↗15 fixturesComplete Realm, Ally, Actor, Avatar, mediation, creation, state, assessment, event, and evaluation records.
Open reference ↗8 abilitiesExecutable guidance for profile building, assessment, Sentinel operation, calibration, feedback, mediation, repair, and scale authoring.
Open reference ↗OpenAPI 3.1Runtime endpoints and event contracts for implementation teams.
Open reference ↗11 casesDeterministic reference functions and executable assertions for the hard parts of the model.
Open reference ↗Implementation handoff
Includes 29 specifications, 15 schemas, 15 examples, 10 scales, 10 dimensions, 8 Skills, an OpenAPI contract, a deterministic engine, validation, and this site.