Coherence reference · Canon V0.37

Alignment without
obedience.

A complete guide to how Kiduna defines desired states, observes actual behavior, measures drift and uncertainty, and responds without collapsing difference into fault—or power into control.

7HEARTS signals examined
10Published scales
15Validated schemas
8Executable Skills
Follow the modelDefineMeasureRespondBuild
01

The foundation

Define the target. Measure the difference.

Coherence is a contextual comparison, not a universal score. The desired state, observed state, and authorized response remain separate, inspectable objects.

01

Presence defines

A versioned profile describes the legitimate desired behavior for this entity, in this context, for this purpose.

Target · tolerance · principles · boundaries
02

Observation estimates

Permissioned evidence updates a contextual current state with confidence, provenance, decay, and visible uncertainty.

Evidence · method · context · retention
03

Coherence compares

An assessment keeps target distance, tolerance-band drift, and absolute boundary risk distinct before selecting a response.

Drift · confidence · Authority · response
Target distanceobserved − targetPoint

Explains direction and magnitude relative to the intended center.

Band driftdistance outside tolerance

Zero while inside the inclusive range. Response zones use this value.

Boundary riskabsolute predicate or region

A legitimate unusual target never neutralizes a constitutional boundary.

02

Research precedent

HEARTS, translated—not imported.

The seven signals contributed bipolar measurement, named landmarks, non-zero local centers, proportional response, continuous observation, and separate escalation. They are not Kiduna’s default dimensions.

H
Decompose

Harmony

Coordination under difference

Conflict is not automatically failure. Measure observable coordination, repair, and the ability to work through difference in context.

E
Decompose

Empowerment

Initiative · autonomy · agency support

Separate what an entity begins, what choices remain open, and whether a system expands Source agency. Never infer one overall human empowerment score.

A
Optional · rename

Artistry

Experimentation or creativity

Use only where novelty and creative exploration can be operationally defined—for Allies, Realms, and bounded creation contexts.

R
Rename · decompose

Reason

Epistemic humility · evidentiary discipline

Measure whether claim strength matches evidence and whether limits and counterevidence are represented—not conformity to one reasoning style.

T
Relationship only

Trust

Reliability · disclosure · verification

Trust remains contextual to a defined relationship and purpose. It never becomes a portable personal score or substitute for Authority.

Sᵢ
Exclude from defaults

Symmetry inward

No default Kiduna dimension

The precedent is too psychological and clinically suggestive for unvalidated behavioral infrastructure.

Sₒ
Decompose

Symmetry outward

Mutuality · reciprocity

Assess a defined interaction while making context, Consent, role, and power explicit. Similarity between participants is not the goal.

Authority line

HEARTS is design precedent only. Current Canon, Authority, Permissions, Consent, Roles, and entity-specific intervention limits control.

Read the full translation ↗
03

Scale explorer

Ten constructs. No hidden virtue.

Select a dimension, move the observation, and inspect its poles, target, tolerance, evidence standard, confounds, and permitted uses. Each side of a scale can be legitimate in context.

Published dimension · v1

Directness

warning

The observable explicitness and force with which an entity communicates a position, request, limit, disagreement, or challenge in a defined context.

guardedRelies on implication, softening, or withholding rather than explicit statements.candidStates the material point clearly while leaving room for response.forcefulStates positions and requests explicitly with strong challenge or insistence.
target
+20
observed
+47
-100avoidant

Does not state the material concern even when invited.

0candid

States the material concern plainly and proportionately.

+100coercive

Uses threat, domination, or relentless pressure to obtain agreement.

Target+20desired center
Tolerance+5+35inclusive aligned range
Target distance+27observed − target
Band drift+12zero inside tolerance

What counts

Observable evidence

  • States the material position explicitly
  • Names disagreement without relying only on implication

Counter-evidence

  • Softens or withholds a material concern

What can mislead

Confounds

  • Language norms, safety, role, power, disability, and medium can change surface style

Construct claim

Estimates communication explicitness and force in the named context, not courage or moral worth.

Evidence standard

Minimum observations
3
Minimum contexts
2
Half-life
7 days
Confidence gate
65%
Method ceiling
85%

Permitted uses

  • Configure Ally or Avatar communication
  • Assess interaction mismatch
  • Support Realm process feedback

Prohibited uses

  • Global human ranking
  • Clinical or personality diagnosis
  • Eligibility decisions unrelated to the declared purpose

Applicable to

realmallyactoravatarinteractionrelationship
04

Measurement

From evidence to a challengeable estimate.

One utterance does not become a trait. Every observation names one subject, dimension, context, time, score, confidence, observer, method, evidence reference, and retention class.

Time-weighted aggregation

timeWeight = 0.5 ^ (ageHours / halfLifeHours)weight = reliability × relevance × timeWeightstateScore = Σ(score × weight) / Σ(weight)

Confidence estimate

base = 1 − exp(−effectiveWeight / evidenceTarget)confidence = base × coverage × agreement × calibrationCap

The system returns every component and reason so the result can be reproduced, corrected, or challenged.

01Authorize observation
02Minimize evidence
03Measure state
04Resolve profile + policy
05Assess drift + boundary
06Select permitted response
07Record outcome
08Recalibrate

Confidence gates

More consequence demands more support.

Missing data means unknown, not zero. Contradiction lowers confidence or creates context-specific states instead of forcing incompatible evidence into one average.

< 0.40

Observe or ask

Disclose uncertainty. No drift intervention.

0.40–0.64

Gather evidence

Suggest more evidence or ask a low-stakes question.

0.65–0.79

Explain or recommend

Reversible low-impact Ally modulation only when policy permits.

≥ 0.80

Authorized correction

Still gated by evidence counts, entity limits, Consent, and Authority.

Dimension

Directness

warning
−100
avoidant
0
candid
+100
coercive
target
+20
observed
+47
Target distance+27observed − target
Band drift+12zero inside +5…+35
Boundaryclearabsolute high boundary +90
Eligible responsefeedback or modulatebefore Authority intersection

At +47, Directness is 12 points above the permitted band. The system evaluates this against +20, not zero.

05

Entity contract

One model. Different authority.

The object model is shared. The eligible response is not. A Sentinel intersects evidence, policy, entity type, Authority, Permission, and Consent before anything happens.

01

Realm

Governed culture, operating norms, decision posture, relationships, and boundaries.

Maximum ordinary automatic response
Pattern notice, facilitation, or policy-gated reversible process controls.
Never
An averaged personality or automatic constitutional change.
02

Ally

Intended reasoning and interaction tendencies inside Source and Realm authority.

Maximum ordinary automatic response
Bounded prompt modulation and reversible behavioral correction.
Never
Self-expansion of purpose, permission, or lifetime.
03

Actor

Execution posture, tools, retry, persistence, stopping, delegation, and escalation.

Maximum ordinary automatic response
Preflight deny, scope reduction, pause, or reversible quarantine.
Never
Unauthorized execution or circumvention of a stop condition.
04

Avatar

How a Source chooses to be represented and to show up in a particular Realm.

Maximum ordinary automatic response
Drafting, representation assistance, questions, and optional feedback.
Never
Covert control, correction, or diagnosis of the Source.

Deterministic precedence

Specificity never overrides legitimacy.

  1. 1Constitutional boundaries
  2. 2Consent & privacy
  3. 3Realm governance
  4. 4Role & Permission
  5. 5Activity / Action
  6. 6Entity profile
  7. 7Session override

Fields compose differently: constraints intersect; permissions narrow; retention shortens; targets use the most specific valid authorized configuration; equal-priority conflicts stop automatic intervention and request resolution.

Response vocabulary

Least force first.

ResponseEffectUse
observeRecord onlyAligned or insufficient evidence
askRequest clarificationAmbiguity or low confidence
suggestOffer an optional changeSmall drift
feedbackExplain evidence and choicesSource-facing or Realm notice
modulateTemporary context directiveAuthorized Ally or Actor
correctChange permitted AI behaviorHigh-confidence intervention zone
mediateFacilitate participantsInteraction mismatch
repairStructured recoveryRepeated drift or harm
escalateRoute accountable decisionExtreme, conflict, or appeal
constrainDeny, pause, or narrowBoundary or prohibited Action

Constitutional boundaries

What local configuration cannot erase.

01

Preserve Source agency

No covert manipulation, impersonation, or control through Avatar or Coherence settings.

02

Explicit Consent

No human behavioral inference outside declared purpose and applicable Consent or lawful Authority.

03

No social score

No global, portable, overall human Coherence or reputation score.

04

No deception

No material misrepresentation of facts, provenance, assistance, Authority, or completed effects.

05

No authority expansion

No Sentinel or entity may widen its own Permission, data, budget, purpose, or lifetime.

06

No governance bypass

A target never substitutes for Realm governance or constitutional Authority.

07

Authorized Resources only

No tools, Connections, data, Compute, money, or Resources outside current Permission.

08

Minimum necessary data

Collect and disclose only the evidence required for the declared purpose and response.

Avatar agency rule

“How I want to show up here” is not “who I am.” Avatar Coherence may shape generated representation, drafting, meeting assistance, or optional feedback. It never authorizes covert control of the Source.

06

Complete package

Read it. Test it. Build from it.

The website is the guided map. The package remains the complete source: normative specifications, portable objects, executable contracts, examples, Skills, API, engine, provenance, and validation.

Implementation handoff

The whole reference, in one package.

Includes 29 specifications, 15 schemas, 15 examples, 10 scales, 10 dimensions, 8 Skills, an OpenAPI contract, a deterministic engine, validation, and this site.

Download Kiduna Coherence
Reference implementation verified11 / 11 executable cases pass